When to consider for Worst Supporting Actress/Actor?
When do you folks consider someone's role in a movie enough to consider them for Worst Supporting Actor/Actress? Personally, I think Worst Supporting should have a minor role in the movie, but definitely more than just a one scene short cameo. It also seems fairer to me, because a one scene cameo isn't a lot to go on actingwise, and with a longer role you can compare it better to the other nominees for Worst Supporting.
Yeah, if, for example, Adam Sandler has a terrible cameo in movie A, and a terrible minor role in movie B, there's no reason why he can't be nominated for both. But if it is just a terrible cameo, like Justin Bieber in Zoolander 2, I'd rather give the award to someone I had to watch in the movie for more than a couple of minutes.
I guess voice-acting can be tricky to determine too, acting-wise, but I will cross that bridge when I get to it when I see Ice Age: Collission Course