CHIPS

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
8 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

CHIPS

Vheid
With only 21% on RT. this is the forum too discuss CHIPS. Any predictions for categories?
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: CHIPS

oiram
Dax Shepard can definitely be considered in multiple categories for this. The movie can also be considered for his real life wife, Kristen Bell, and also Vincent D'Onofrio, who was also in Rings.

Probably the most likely categories, however, are Worst Remake and Worst Screen Combo for Shepard and either Bell or Michael Pena... Or maybe just Shepard and Pena.
Worst Actor - Tom Cruise (nom) (Winner of the Razzie for Worst Screen Couple and the Razzie for Most Tiresome Tabloid Target (which really didn't have anything to do with movies, but whatever), but he never won Worst Actor, where he was nominated twice. Will third time be the charm?), Matt Damon (nom) (Been called uninteresting and is also accused of promoting a white savior movie. Also since his buddy Ben Affleck has been nominated multiple times, why not him?), Johnny Depp (Just imagine the cruel irony of winning for the role that original got him his first Oscar nom.), Jamie Dornan (nom) (Won for the role last time, need I say more?), Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson (nom) (Not only did his movie pretty much flop, but he ends up complaining about the criticism on Twitter! Plus, he's been nominated before and Jumanji doesn't look so hot either.), and Mark Wahlberg (nom) (If this is his last "hurrah" in the Transformers movies, maybe he should get a nom as extra motivation to stay away. Marky Mark doesn't want to become a repeat offender, does he?)

Worst Actress - Kate Beckinsale (nom) (The series that gave her something resembling a career has hit a new low. Will it final get her a Worst Actress award?), Katherine Heigl (SHE MUST WIN!), Scarlett Johansson (nom) (Starred in two box-office bombs, one of them with the stigma of whitewashing. Plus it'd be interesting to have her.), Dakota Johnson (nom) (Won for the role last time, need I say more?), Milla Jovovich (nom) (Considering that the last outing got her a nom, maybe she'll receive another one.), and Amy Schumer (nom) (Not only has her humor been described as getting stale and one-note, but she's been labeling any criticisms of that as "evil conservatives" to try and dismiss them, and now this led up a movie that is not so well received for many reasons, not the least of which being that she did not bring the funny, and did pretty poorly at the box-office.)

Worst Supporting Actor - Javier Bardem (nom) (He does not lend much to the movie he stars in, and the special effects on him make his performance look worse!), Anthony Hopkins (If he is nominated, he'll break a Razzie record. If he wins, he'll break TWO records!), Eric Johnson (nom) (Basically used to make Christian Grey look less bad by comparison!), Ben Kingsley (nom) (Not only a Razzie repeat offender, but his character in Collide keeps watching the Razzie nominated movie Perfect and keeps talking almost creepily about Razzie perennial Burt Reynolds!), Rob Lowe (nom) (Previously won a Razzie in this category, why not nominate him again if he's going to appear in films like Monster Trucks?), and John Turturro (nom) (He has made the ballots for the Transformers movies before, but always gets shut out. Maybe this will be his chance at a nom.)

Worst Supporting Actress - Kim Basinger (Basically in this movie because 9 1/2 Weeks, her first Razzie nomination.), Faye Dunaway (nom) (Razzie perennial Dunaway is attempting to make a big comeback, but starting off with The Bye Bye Man, not to mention being a part of the Best Picture flub at the Oscars, things do not look good for her.), Laura Haddock (nom) (She seems to be a good actress, but when put into a Bay movie where she has to look pretty while being a scientist, Star-Lord's mom cannot pull it off.), Marcia Gay Harden (nom) (Jane Seymour got a nomination for the parody version of the role, so why not the real thing?), Goldie Hawn (nom) (Making her big-screen comeback in Snatched... a movie which stunk and she stunk in it, a surefire way to receive a second nom in this category.), and Isabela Moner (nom) (Comes off as a preachy character, more than likely going to annoy some.)

Worst Director - Michael Bay (nom) (Going to go down in history as the most Razzie nominated director thanks to these Transformers movies. I would not be surprised if he wins.), James Foley (Previous Razzie nominee has returned after about three decades to direct the sequel to the Razzie winning Fifty Shades of Grey. I'd say he has this in the bag.), Alex Kurtzman (nom) (Speaking of Transformers, one of the Razzie winning writers of the first and second one tried to start a cinematic universe, and boy howdy, did it get off to a rocky start!), Guy Ritchie (nom) (Speaking of cinematic universes, previous Razzie winner and husband of Madonna tried to start one too, and man did it turn out messy!), Chris Wedge (nom) (Going from animation to live-action and came out with a write-off... yeah...), and Zhang Yimou (nom) (Even with his stylized directing, he could not make the characters interesting, or those lizard creatures look convincing.)
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: CHIPS

Vits
In reply to this post by Vheid
Chris Bumbray's review.

Jeremy Jahns' video review.
Vheid wrote
only 21% on RT.
And the consensus reads "It abandons the endearing innocence of its source material, using the titular cop show's premise as a setup for aggressively lowbrow gags that prove only mildly arresting at best."
Follow me on Twitter @Vits_Chile
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: CHIPS

MiguelAntilsu
The CHiPs are down, so to speak.  This film had a number of warning signs indicating that it was terrible: a 10-week marketing campaign, only 2 trailers, and no advance screenings for critics.  "CHiPs" will join a long line of the worst films based on TV series, which includes "The Avengers" (1998), "Wild Wild West", "The Dukes of Hazzard", "Land of the Lost", and "The Last Airbender".  Whether or not this film will win Razzies is still up in the air.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: CHIPS

oiram
MiguelAntilsu wrote
The CHiPs are down, so to speak.  This film had a number of warning signs indicating that it was terrible: a 10-week marketing campaign, only 2 trailers, and no advance screenings for critics.  "CHiPs" will join a long line of the worst films based on TV series, which includes "The Avengers" (1998), "Wild Wild West", "The Dukes of Hazzard", "Land of the Lost", and "The Last Airbender".  Whether or not this film will win Razzies is still up in the air.
It's still up in the air whether or not it'll be nominated, let alone win.
Worst Actor - Tom Cruise (nom) (Winner of the Razzie for Worst Screen Couple and the Razzie for Most Tiresome Tabloid Target (which really didn't have anything to do with movies, but whatever), but he never won Worst Actor, where he was nominated twice. Will third time be the charm?), Matt Damon (nom) (Been called uninteresting and is also accused of promoting a white savior movie. Also since his buddy Ben Affleck has been nominated multiple times, why not him?), Johnny Depp (Just imagine the cruel irony of winning for the role that original got him his first Oscar nom.), Jamie Dornan (nom) (Won for the role last time, need I say more?), Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson (nom) (Not only did his movie pretty much flop, but he ends up complaining about the criticism on Twitter! Plus, he's been nominated before and Jumanji doesn't look so hot either.), and Mark Wahlberg (nom) (If this is his last "hurrah" in the Transformers movies, maybe he should get a nom as extra motivation to stay away. Marky Mark doesn't want to become a repeat offender, does he?)

Worst Actress - Kate Beckinsale (nom) (The series that gave her something resembling a career has hit a new low. Will it final get her a Worst Actress award?), Katherine Heigl (SHE MUST WIN!), Scarlett Johansson (nom) (Starred in two box-office bombs, one of them with the stigma of whitewashing. Plus it'd be interesting to have her.), Dakota Johnson (nom) (Won for the role last time, need I say more?), Milla Jovovich (nom) (Considering that the last outing got her a nom, maybe she'll receive another one.), and Amy Schumer (nom) (Not only has her humor been described as getting stale and one-note, but she's been labeling any criticisms of that as "evil conservatives" to try and dismiss them, and now this led up a movie that is not so well received for many reasons, not the least of which being that she did not bring the funny, and did pretty poorly at the box-office.)

Worst Supporting Actor - Javier Bardem (nom) (He does not lend much to the movie he stars in, and the special effects on him make his performance look worse!), Anthony Hopkins (If he is nominated, he'll break a Razzie record. If he wins, he'll break TWO records!), Eric Johnson (nom) (Basically used to make Christian Grey look less bad by comparison!), Ben Kingsley (nom) (Not only a Razzie repeat offender, but his character in Collide keeps watching the Razzie nominated movie Perfect and keeps talking almost creepily about Razzie perennial Burt Reynolds!), Rob Lowe (nom) (Previously won a Razzie in this category, why not nominate him again if he's going to appear in films like Monster Trucks?), and John Turturro (nom) (He has made the ballots for the Transformers movies before, but always gets shut out. Maybe this will be his chance at a nom.)

Worst Supporting Actress - Kim Basinger (Basically in this movie because 9 1/2 Weeks, her first Razzie nomination.), Faye Dunaway (nom) (Razzie perennial Dunaway is attempting to make a big comeback, but starting off with The Bye Bye Man, not to mention being a part of the Best Picture flub at the Oscars, things do not look good for her.), Laura Haddock (nom) (She seems to be a good actress, but when put into a Bay movie where she has to look pretty while being a scientist, Star-Lord's mom cannot pull it off.), Marcia Gay Harden (nom) (Jane Seymour got a nomination for the parody version of the role, so why not the real thing?), Goldie Hawn (nom) (Making her big-screen comeback in Snatched... a movie which stunk and she stunk in it, a surefire way to receive a second nom in this category.), and Isabela Moner (nom) (Comes off as a preachy character, more than likely going to annoy some.)

Worst Director - Michael Bay (nom) (Going to go down in history as the most Razzie nominated director thanks to these Transformers movies. I would not be surprised if he wins.), James Foley (Previous Razzie nominee has returned after about three decades to direct the sequel to the Razzie winning Fifty Shades of Grey. I'd say he has this in the bag.), Alex Kurtzman (nom) (Speaking of Transformers, one of the Razzie winning writers of the first and second one tried to start a cinematic universe, and boy howdy, did it get off to a rocky start!), Guy Ritchie (nom) (Speaking of cinematic universes, previous Razzie winner and husband of Madonna tried to start one too, and man did it turn out messy!), Chris Wedge (nom) (Going from animation to live-action and came out with a write-off... yeah...), and Zhang Yimou (nom) (Even with his stylized directing, he could not make the characters interesting, or those lizard creatures look convincing.)
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: CHIPS

Vits
WHAT THE FLICK?!'s video review.
Follow me on Twitter @Vits_Chile
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: CHIPS

Dun-Ida
This post was updated on .
Potential nominations to consider:

Worst Actor
Michael Peña. Sometimes his screen presence is dull. Other times he is annoyingly unfunny.
Dax Shepard. Just like Peña he is dull and unfunny.

Worst Supporting Actor
Justin Chatwin. His wooden performance cannot be ignored.

Worst Prequel, Remake, Ripoff or Sequel

Worst Director
Dax Shepard. He directorial efforts clearly show little effort. Shepard did little, if any, to make the movie look entertaining.

Worst Screenplay
Dax Shepard. His attempt at writing is just as poor as his directing. There is little humor in the screenplay. There is also little material to make the main characters sympathetic.

Worst Screen Combination
Michael Peña and Dax Shepard. Their combined screen presence is unfunny and is often unbearable.


Dishonorable mentions: Worst Picture. Worst Supporting Actress: Kristen Bell.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: CHIPS

Vits
I just saw it. For your consideration:
-Worst Actor for Dax Shepard.
-Worst Supporting Actor for Vincent D'Onofrio (also for RINGS).
-Worst Screen Combo for Shepard and Rosa Salazar.
-Worst Director.
-Worst Screenplay.
-Worst Remake or Rip-Off (it counts as one, because a TV movie sequel to the show was made in the 90s).
-Worst Picture.
But not:
-Worst Actor for Michael Peña.
-Worst Screen Combo for Shepard and Peña.
Follow me on Twitter @Vits_Chile
Loading...